![]() |
| Size Communication in Dogs |
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label motivation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label motivation. Show all posts
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Size communication in domestic dog, Canis familiaris, growls
A comparison of dog–dog and dog–human play behaviour
![]() |
| Dog-Dog vs Human-Dog Playing |
Abstract
In
the popular literature, it is often assumed that a single conceptual
framework can be applied to both dog–dog and dog–human interactions,
including play. We have, through three studies, tested the hypothesis
that dog–dog and dog–human play are motivationally distinct. In an
observational study of dogs being walked by their owners (N=402),
dogs which were walked together, and had opportunities to play with one
another, played with their owners with the same frequency as dogs being
walked alone. This finding was supported by a questionnaire survey of
2585 dog owners in which dogs in multi-dog households played slightly
more often with their owners than dogs in single-dog households. The
performance of dog–dog play does not, therefore, seem to suppress the
dogs' motivation to play with their owners as would be predicted if they
were motivationally interchangeable. In an experimental comparison of
dog–dog and dog–human toy-centred play, the dogs were more likely to
give up on a competition, to show and present the toy to their play
partner, if that partner was human. When two toys were available, dogs
playing with other dogs spent less time showing interest in both toys
and possessed one of the toys for longer, than dogs playing with people.
Overall, the dogs were more interactive and less likely to possess the
object when playing with a person. We conclude that dog–dog and
dog–human play are structurally different, supporting the idea that they
are motivationally distinct. We therefore suggest there is no reason to
assume that the consequences of dog–dog play can be extrapolated to
play with humans.
Saturday, October 27, 2012
The breakfast effect: Dogs (Canis familiaris) search more accurately when they are less hungry
Abstract
We investigated whether the consumption of a morning meal (breakfast) by dogs (Canis familiaris)
would affect search accuracy on a working memory task following the
exertion of self-control. Dogs were tested either 30 or 90 min after
consuming half of their daily resting energy requirements (RER). During
testing dogs were initially required to sit still for 10 min before
searching for hidden food in a visible displacement task. We found that
30 min following the consumption of breakfast, and 10 min after the
behavioral inhibition task, dogs searched more accurately than they did
in a fasted state. Similar differences were not observed when dogs were
tested 90 min after meal consumption. This pattern of behavior suggests
that breakfast enhanced search accuracy following a behavioral
inhibition task by providing energy for cognitive processes, and that
search accuracy decreased as a function of energy depletion.
Dogs, Canis familiaris, communicate with humans to request but not to inform
Refutation of the stereotype of a “killer dog” in light of the behavioral interpretation of human corpses biting by domestic dogs
Abstract
Postmortem
bite injuries caused by domestic dogs are not very common, but because
of their special character and concomitant occurrence, explaining them
requires extensive forensic expertise and knowledge of the basics of
animal behavior. The authors have analyzed reasons for the damage of
human body caused by the dogs, with suspicion of fatal biting.
Characteristics of the wounds, the description of the crime scene, the
available psychophysical data of the animals, and the likely motives for
the behavior exhibited by the dogs were examined. In the course of the
study, it was concluded that the wounds were postmortem in nature and
the crime scene character was atypical for the satisfaction of the
scavenging instinct. Moreover, detailed analysis of the cases described
in the text later revealed that uncharacteristic anxiety reactions with
the sequent satisfaction of the exaggerated form of care-giving and the
loyalty to the guardians were the most likely motivations for the
actions of the dogs in the face of human death.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

