Canine Olfaction |
Abstract
In
two experimental studies, we observed whether dogs rely on olfactory
and/or visual information about the hiding place for food in a
two-choice test. However, for some dogs direct olfactory (smelling the
food) or visual (observing of the food being hidden) experience has been
contradicted by human pointing (a well-known communicative gesture for
the dog) to the ‘incorrect’ hiding place. We have found that dogs were
able to use both olfactory and visual cues efficiently to choose above
chance in a choice situation when there was no human cueing. However, in
other experimental groups the dogs tended to choose the bowl pointed at
by the human. This change in their behavior was more pronounced if they
had only olfactory information about the location of the food. In
contrast, if they had seen where the food was placed, dogs were more
reluctant to follow the pointing gesture, but even so their performance
worsened compared to the case in which they saw only the bowl baited.
These
results give further support for the hypothesis that dogs regard the
pointing gesture as being a communicative act about the placing of the
food, but they do not rely on this gesture blindly and they can modify
their behavior based on visual experience related directly to the hiding
of the food. Further, contrary to general expectations dogs rely in
this situation, only to some degree on olfactory cues.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.