Abstract
Previous
research has found that dogs will search accurately for an invisibly
displaced object when the task is simplified and contextual ambiguity is
eliminated [Doré, F.Y., Fiset, S., Goulet, S., Dumas, M.-C., Gagnon,
S., 1996. Search behavior in cats and dogs: interspecific differences in
working memory and spatial cognition. Animal Learning & Behavior
24, 142–149; Miller, H., Gipson, C., Vaughan, A., Rayburn-Reeves, R.,
Zentall, T.R., 2009. Object permanence in dogs: invisible displacement
in a rotation task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16 (1), 150–155].
For example, when an object is placed inside an occluder, one of which
was attached to each end of a beam that could be rotated 90°, dogs
search inside of the appropriate occluder. The current research
confirmed this finding and tested the possibility that the dogs were
using a perceptual/conditioning mechanism (i.e., their gaze was drawn to
the occluder as the object was placed inside and they continued looking
at it as it rotated). The test was done by introducing a delay between
the displacement of the object and the initiation of the dogs’ search.
In Experiment 1, during the delay, a barrier was placed between the dog
and the apparatus. In Experiment 2, the lights were turned off during
the delay. The search accuracy for some dogs was strongly affected by
the delay, however, search accuracy for other dogs was not affected.
These results suggest that although a perceptual/conditioning mechanism
may be involved for some dogs, it cannot account for the performance of
others. It is likely that these other dogs showed true object
permanence.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.