Abstract
Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris)
were administered a progressive elimination task in which they had to
visit and deplete three baited sites. Dogs were brought back to the
starting point after each visit to any site whether they had made a
correct or an incorrect choice. In Experiment 1 (n = 10) the
results revealed that the dogs randomly selected among the sites when
they were equidistant from the starting point whereas they relied on the
least distance rule when one of sites was closer to the starting point
than were the other sites. In Experiment 2 (n = 12), the dogs
first chose the left target when angular deviation between adjacent
targets varied whether the least angular deviation was on the right of
the left. Results are interpreted in terms of Gibson's hypothesis about
cooperative hunters. The discussion also emphasizes comparisons with
cats (i.e., solitary hunters).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.