Abstract
Dog
owners ascribe guilt to dogs, and we explored this attribution with pet
dogs and their owners using a questionnaire and experiment. The
questionnaire found that the majority of owners perceive dog behavior as
guilty in certain situations and believe that dogs know when they have
committed a disapproved act. As a novel finding, the questionnaire
revealed that dog presentation of guilty behavior could lead owners to
scold dogs less.
The experiment aimed to investigate
the owner-reported anecdote that dogs sometimes greet owners displaying
guilty behavior. Owners claim to be unaware of a dog's misdeed and
assert it is the guilty behavior that informs them of the dog's
infraction. We studied whether dogs that were disobedient in owners’
absences showed associated behaviors of guilt (ABs) upon owners’ return
to a room. We also assessed whether owners could determine their dog's
disobedience by relying solely on the dog's greeting behavior.
Behavioral
analysis revealed no significant difference between obedient and
disobedient dogs in their display of ABs after having the opportunity to
break a rule in owners’ absences. Analyses at the individual level,
however, revealed a significant increase in cross situational
presentation of ABs only by dogs that transgressed in owners’ absences.
While owners appeared able to determine whether or not their dogs ate in
their absences, a subset of owners—those whose decisions were most
likely based solely on dog greeting behavior and not earlier
experiment-generated cues—were not better than chance in their
determinations. Taken together, our findings suggest that dog
presentation of ABs during greetings is not necessarily a reliable
indicator whether or not a dog engaged in a misdeed. The investigated
phenomenon appears to be very sensitive to the social condition, which
includes owner prior experience with their dog in specific contexts.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.